Sirolimus Rx

Studied doses vs folklore doses

Every row cites its source. Where a cell reflects our own reading of the evidence rather than an external source, the row says so.

Every dose below is either what a label or trial actually specifies, or what real-world users actually take, each at its own evidence grade. No mouse conversion appears because no valid one exists.

Studied doses vs folklore doses
regimenwho_and_contextevidence_gradewhat_it_showedSource
6 mg loading, then 2 mg dailyRenal transplant, low-to-moderate risk (FDA label)FDA labelHalved acute rejection in pivotal trials, with the label's full warning ledgersource
Up to 15 mg loading, then 5 mg dailyRenal transplant, high immunologic risk (FDA label)FDA labelApproved high-risk regimen with trough-guided adjustmentsource
2 mg daily, titrated to troughs 5-15 ng/mLLAM (FDA label; MILES trial)Human RCTStabilized lung function while on drug; decline resumed after stoppingsource
1 mg daily, 8 weeksAdults 70-95, safety pilot (Kraig 2018)Human RCTFeasibility and short-term safety; no efficacy endpoints movedsource
5 or 10 mg compounded, once weekly, 48 weeksHealthy adults, PEARL RCT (AgelessRx)Human RCTPrimary endpoint missed; AEs similar to placebo; secondary signals in womensource
Commercial 2-8 mg or compounded 5-15 mg, weeklyReal-world longevity users (blood-level cohorts)Human PKCompounded delivers about one third the exposure per mg; levels peak day 2source
Typical folklore: 5-7 mg weekly 'for longevity'Off-label prescribing economy; 333-user survey documents the practiceHuman observationalTolerability by self-report; zero outcome data for the schedulesource
4.7 / 14 / 42 ppm of chowITP mice (the lifespan results)AnimalThe lifespan extensions; NOT convertible to a human mg dose, and this site does not convert itsource
Start provider review